? HOW MANY OBJECTS
 
 HOW MANY OBJECTS? 
 This test is best administered by masking the card and successively  uncovering from the top each row of three panels. Moving as fast as you  can from top left to bottom right. say out loud how many objects there  are in each panel. 
 You are likely to have made an error. hesitated or taken longer on  reaching the last two panels. This is because the objects in each panel  are Arabic numerals whose names and meaning are those of numerical  quantities that differ from the actual number of objects displayed. The  objects in the preceding panels are themselves irrelevant to the  numerical quantity task. and are not. in fact. quite so easy to name as  the Arabic numerals. They do not interfere with the task of saying the  number as we do not have to make any special effort to ignore them. We  are therefore unprepared to ignore the Arabic numerals when they occur.  and when we see them their meaning is immediately understood and made  available for speech. The principle at work here is similar to that in  the Colour Naming tasks: our intention is to apprehend numerical  quantity and say out loud the number of objects we see. and that is easy  when we are presented with a small number of objects whose meaning is  not in the domain of number. We apprehend immediately the quantity of up  to five closely arrayed objects. When the objects whose number is to be  stated are themselves numerals i.e. in the domain of number. we have to  make a special effort to ignore them. and interference occurs at the  level of speech. This demonstrates once more the difficulty we have in  selectively attending to one aspect of a display and totally ignoring  another aspect. 
 Freud was deeply interested in those speech errors that occur when what  is produced is different from what was intended. seeing it as revelatory  of what the speaker had in mind irrespective of the conscious intention  to say something else. This was a central theme of his classic The  Psychopathology of Everyday Life (1904). Research indicates. however.  that many errors produced by speech processes might merely reflect an  innocuous aspect of the nervous system as such.
